WAM to GPA

A working equivalence with its method printed beside it: your WAM placed between the pass line (50) and the ceiling (100), replayed onto the US 4.0. Honest, checkable, and labelled for what it is.

WAM in, 4.0-scale outband anchoring · zero upload

Your WAM

Working equivalence-enter a grade above

WAM	Linear 4.0 equivalence
95	3.70
90	3.40
85	3.10
80	2.80
75	2.50
70	2.20
65	1.90
60	1.60
55	1.30
50	1.00

Not an evaluationThis is a working equivalence with its method shown - not a credential evaluation any institution accepts. Here is the difference, plainly.

The method, and its honest limits

Equivalence = 1.0 + 3.0 × (your WAM − 50) ÷ (100 − 50) - the pass line lands on a US D (1.0) and the ceiling on 4.0, the same linear logic as Germany's modified Bavarian formula for foreign grades, generalized. Below the pass line, no equivalence is printed, because a failing grade has no US GPA equivalent worth pretending about.

The universities themselves are unusually blunt here: UNSW says it "does not use a grade point average system", Sydney and Melbourne say the same, and Deakin states it uses a WAM where others use a GPA. Monash is the exception - it publishes an official 4.0 GPA beside its WAM (HD 4.0, D 3.0, C 2.0, P 1.0), so a Monash student asked for a GPA should use that scale, not any conversion. For everyone else, whoever demands the GPA owns the conversion method; the number above is a defensible position to hand them, with its method attached.

Compute the WAM itself first on the right rules: UNSW, USYD, Melbourne, Monash (first-year halved), Deakin, Macquarie, RMIT, or the general WAM calculator.

Questions this page gets asked

How do I convert my WAM to a GPA?

There is no official conversion - UNSW, Sydney, Melbourne and Deakin all say so. A defensible working equivalence anchors the pass line (50) and the ceiling (100) and places your WAM proportionally on the US 4.0 between D and 4.0. A WAM of 75 lands at 2.50 that way; whether a receiving institution applies something more generous is their call, not the WAM's.

Is a 75 WAM a good GPA?

A 75 WAM is a Distinction-band average in most Australian universities - a genuinely strong record. Linear conversion understates that (2.50), which is exactly why the caveat matters: US evaluators reviewing course-by-course routinely land Distinction averages well above the linear number.

Does Monash have an official WAM to GPA conversion?

Monash sidesteps the question by publishing both: an official WAM and an official 4.0 GPA (HD 4.0, D 3.0, C 2.0, P 1.0, fails 0.3, WN 0.0). Use its GPA directly - no conversion needed.

Why does every WAM to GPA table give different numbers?

Because each is a private invention: no Australian university and no US body publishes one. Tables that map HD to 4.0 and Distinction to 3.7 mirror evaluator practice; linear interpolation mirrors the German Bavarian method. This page shows the linear number and names the method so the result is checkable.

Keep this page

Reading someone else's grades for a job or an admission? How to read a foreign grade